skip to main content

英國教育標準署督學培訓與專業發展在我國實施之可行性研究

蔡青芳; Tsai, Ching-fang 姜麗娟; Li-chuan Chiang; 國民教育研究所 2003

線上取得

  • 題名:
    英國教育標準署督學培訓與專業發展在我國實施之可行性研究
  • 著者: 蔡青芳; Tsai, Ching-fang
  • 姜麗娟; Li-chuan Chiang; 國民教育研究所
  • 主題: 督學; 專業發展; 培訓; 英國教育標準署; inspectors; professional development; training; Office for Standards in Education (OFSTED)
  • 描述: 摘要本研究之目的在於瞭解國內督學對於培訓與專業發展之需求、探討英國教育標準署的督學培訓與專業發展制度對於國內建立制度之參考價值。為達此目的,研究者除對國內督學的任用制度、培訓與專業發展現況、英國的制度運作方式、課程內涵進行探究外,並以半結構式訪談法與十位現任或曾任督學者進行深入訪談,瞭解受訪督學對於英國制度之看法,以及英國制度在國內實施之可行性與困難。本研究發現:一、 目前國內督學之任用係由教育部長、縣市首長從具備資格之人員中遴用,並未經過特定的公開遴選程序;而國內無督學培訓制度,專業發展機會相當少,但受訪督學均認為督學培訓與專業發展相當必要。而從過去的研究當中也顯示,督學的培訓與專業發展對於督學的專業養成相當有益,實有必要對此一制度進行深入探討。二、 英國教育標準署督學培訓與專業發展制度化程度高,其特色包括督學的培訓與專業發展有法令為依據,由教育標準署規劃課程,另將課程以委外辦理之方式實行,並針對課程進行管理與評鑑,費用負擔多元等,而課程內涵方面則依據督學類別及其工作需求而設計,專業發展課程有必修與選修課程之分,另外,尚有督學專業期刊之發行。三、 受訪督學認為英國的督學培訓與專業發展制度頗為理想:英國有淵遠流長的視導制度、教育市場化、家長選擇權等助力,而能促成教育標準署之設立與督學專業之需求。但國內視導制度不甚受到重視、中央與縣市沒有法定督學室且無直屬關係、視導範圍不同等,使得國內建立督學培訓與專業發展制度較為困難。考量兩國脈絡之不同,英國制度當中,以發行督學專業期刊短期內最可行,其他英國制度之作法可做為國內建立制度之參考。研究者並依據研究結論,建議未來研究可針對課程開設單位相關事項、政府對於此一制度之看法與困難處、以焦點訪談法增加研究對象等方向深入研究,使此一研究領域更臻完備。
    ABSTRACTThis study aims to understand the needs of training and professional development of inspectors in Taiwan, and to explore the value of the training and professional development system of Office for Standards in Education (OFSTED) for Taiwan to establish the inspectors’ training and professional development system. To achieve the aim, extensive literature about inspectors’ appointment, training and professional development status quo of Taiwan and that of OFSTED and the course of inspectors’ training and professional development is reviewed. Moreover, ten current and former inspectors are invited to give their comments regarding the feasibility and difficulties if the OFSTED inspectors’ training and professional system were likely to be introduced in Taiwan. The main findings of the study include:First, inspectors are selected and appointed by Minister of Education and chief of local government from those who have qualifications. Thus, there is no public selecting procedure or any training system as well as a few professional development opportunities for inspectors. As previous studies, the interview results of this study suggest that the necessity and benefit of inspectors’ training and professional development system are recognized.Second, the inspectors’ training and professional development system of OFSTED is highly institutionalized. Its characteristics includes laws to norm the system, courses designed by OFSTED and practiced by authorized contractors, management and evaluation of courses, diverse types of payments, etc. The courses, designed for different needs of inspectors, are divided into required and selective ones. More importantly, for effective communication among inspectors, OFTSED and contractors, a professional journal called Update is regularly published.Third, the study suggests that the inspectors’ training and professional development system of OFSTED is to some extent desired by the interviewees. However, certain contextual factors should be taken into account, including the well-established history of inspection system in U.K., marketization of education, parents’ choice to push the establishment of OFSTED and the professionalizing of inspector. In Taiwan, the inspection system seems to be neglected by the government. Furthermore, there is no legal inspection division, no subordinate relation, and different jurisdiction between central and local education government, which make it hard to establish inspectors’ training and professional development system. Nevertheless, the most feasible practice for Taiwan to learn from the OFSTED is to publish the inspectors’ professional journal for effectively experience change. But other arrangements in the OFSTED might be useful for reference.According to conclusions of the study, the researcher suggests that the views of the government, and those of the course providers should be investigated. The focus study can be used for further study to broaden the views regarding the establishment of inspectors’ training and professional development system.
    碩士
  • 建立日期: 2003
  • 格式: 121 bytes
    text/html
  • 語言: 中文
  • 識別號: http://nutnr.lib.nutn.edu.tw/handle/987654321/5094
  • 資源來源: NUTN IR

正在檢索遠程資料庫,請稍等