skip to main content
Guest
e-Shelf
My Account
Sign out
Sign in
This feature requires javascript
Library Search
Library Home
A-Z
Citation Linker
Course Reserves
New Books
Tags
Help
Language:
English
Chinese
This feature required javascript
This feature requires javascript
Primo Search
Primo Local Repository
Library Collection + Article
ILS ALEPH
Library Collection
article
Article
NUTN IR
IR
Search For:
Clear Search Box
Search in:
article
Or hit Enter to replace search target
Or select another collection:
Search in:
article
Advanced Search
Browse Search
This feature requires javascript
Show Results with:
Search type
criteria input
that contain my query words
with my exact phrase
Show Results with:
Search type Index
criteria input
anywhere in the record
in the title
ISBN
ISSN
Show Results with:
in the title
Show Results with:
anywhere in the record
in the title
ISBN
ISSN
This feature requires javascript
一國兩「制」?從「一綱多本」與「一綱一本」論爭探討臺美教師對課程發展與教材設計的不同解讀
唐淑華(Tang,Shu-Hua)
Jiao ke shu yan jiu, 2010-12, Vol.3 (2), p.063-092
Full text available
Citations
Cited by
View Online
Details
Reviews & Tags
Recommendations
More
Times Cited
This feature requires javascript
Actions
Add to e-Shelf
Remove from e-Shelf
E-mail
Print
Permalink
Citation
EndNote
Export RIS
This feature requires javascript
Title:
一國兩「制」?從「一綱多本」與「一綱一本」論爭探討臺美教師對課程發展與教材設計的不同解讀
Author:
唐淑華(Tang,Shu-Hua)
Subjects:
multiple-texts
;
No Child Left Behind Act
;
one-guideline-one-version
;
textbooks
;
TSSCI
;
一綱多本
;
教科書
;
有教無類法案
Is Part Of:
Jiao ke shu yan jiu, 2010-12, Vol.3 (2), p.063-092
Description:
教科書在臺灣一向被大多數老師視為教學的主要工具,相反的,美國教育現場不但對教科書的功能有較為不同的定義,在教材及評量方式上,美國教師亦握有相當大的自主權。由於上述不同作法,不同國家乃衍生不同的教育問題:在臺灣有關「一綱多本」或「一綱一本」的論爭始終是熱門話題;在美國有關如何提升課程品質以及探討老師素質是否足以勝任培養學生基本能力等績效方面的議題,則是這一波「有教無類法案」教改運動主要關注的重點。因此本文企圖先以課程教學研究的觀點針對兩國對「考試」、「課程」、「教材」的不同解讀方式進行論述比較,再回到臺灣當前有關「一綱多本」教科書論爭的議題進行探討,最後則分析美國在「教師專業成長」的特色,並說明哪些作法可供臺灣借鏡。結語處則以實踐專業自主的觀點切入,說明為了達成「多元化教育」的教改理想,在教師層級、考試層級以及教科書編審層級皆應發揮各自專業角色以利轉化工作之進行。本文最後亦認為美國教改經驗固然對於臺灣有相當多啟示,但家家有本難唸的經,臺灣教育工作者應積極尋求自己的解答
Textbooks are considered as the predominant classroom resource by most K-9 teachers. In particular, several studies have found that teachers in Taiwan are extremely anxious about challenging textual authority. As a result, their teaching is centered on textbooks. Even now educational policy in Taiwan is calling on the use of multiple-texts as supplementary materials along with designated textbooks, teachers still find it difficult to bring themselves to use alternative textbooks. In contrast, American teachers are given more autonomy to decide teaching materials as well as evalu
Publisher:
台灣: 國家教育研究院
Language:
Chinese
Identifier:
ISSN: 1999-8856
EISSN: 1999-8864
DOI: 10.6481/JTR.201012.0063
Source:
Airiti Library
Links
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Back to results list
Previous
Result
7
Next
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait
Searching for
in
primo_central_multiple_fe
Show me what you have so far
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript