skip to main content
Guest
e-Shelf
My Account
Sign out
Sign in
This feature requires javascript
Library Search
Library Home
A-Z
Citation Linker
Course Reserves
New Books
Tags
Help
Language:
English
Chinese
This feature required javascript
This feature requires javascript
Primo Search
Primo Local Repository
Library Collection + Article
ILS ALEPH
Library Collection
article
Article
NUTN IR
IR
Search For:
Clear Search Box
Search in:
Primo Local Repository
Or hit Enter to replace search target
Or select another collection:
Search in:
Primo Local Repository
Advanced Search
Browse Search
This feature requires javascript
Resource type
criteria input
eBooks
eJournals
Audio Visual
All items
Show Results with:
criteria input
that contain my query words
with my exact phrase
starts with
Show Results with:
Search type Index
criteria input
anywhere in the record
in the title
ISBN
ISSN
Show Results with:
in the title
Show Results with:
anywhere in the record
in the title
ISBN
ISSN
This feature requires javascript
Moral Theorizing and the Source of Normativity in Classical Chinese Philosophy: An Outline
Brunozzi, Philippe
Dao : a journal of comparative philosophy, 2020-09, Vol.19 (3), p.335-351
[Peer Reviewed Journal]
Full text available
Citations
Cited by
View Online
Details
Reviews & Tags
Recommendations
More
Times Cited
This feature requires javascript
Actions
Add to e-Shelf
Remove from e-Shelf
E-mail
Print
Permalink
Citation
EndNote
Export RIS
This feature requires javascript
Title:
Moral Theorizing and the Source of Normativity in Classical Chinese Philosophy: An Outline
Author:
Brunozzi, Philippe
Subjects:
Chinese
;
Chinese languages
;
Education
;
Ethics
;
Non-Western Philosophy
;
Philosophy
;
Philosophy of Religion
;
Phraseologisms
;
Poetry
;
Religious Studies
;
Written language
Is Part Of:
Dao : a journal of comparative philosophy, 2020-09, Vol.19 (3), p.335-351
Description:
When engaging with classical Chinese ethics, we might end up wondering what kind of moral theorizing we ultimately are confronted with. The accounts and answers to specific practical problems are dispersed throughout the texts and expressed via various codes of composition, ranging from sayings to theoretical reflections to poems. However, what exactly the aim of these theories consists in is not explicitly addressed by systematic second-order reflections. In this article I try to shed some light on the understanding of moral theorizing that underlies the transmitted texts. For this, I adopt an issue-centered approach that attempts to indirectly address the understanding of moral theorizing via the question about the source of normativity. That approach will be tested by drawing on the accounts of Mengzi 孟子 and C heng Yi 程頤. First conclusions will show that moral theorizing can be understood as the simultaneous business of a moral anatomist and a moral painter.
Publisher:
Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands
Language:
English
Identifier:
ISSN: 1540-3009
EISSN: 1569-7274
DOI: 10.1007/s11712-020-09730-3
Source:
OmniFile full text select
SpringerNature Journals
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Back to results list
Previous
Result
10
Next
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait
Searching for
in
scope:("NUTN"),scope:(NUTN_ALEPH),scope:(NUTN_IR),scope:(NUTN_SFX),primo_central_multiple_fe
Show me what you have so far
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Previous