skip to main content
Guest
e-Shelf
My Account
Sign out
Sign in
This feature requires javascript
Library Search
Library Home
A-Z
Citation Linker
Course Reserves
New Books
Tags
Help
Language:
English
Chinese
This feature required javascript
This feature requires javascript
Primo Search
Primo Local Repository
Library Collection + Article
ILS ALEPH
Library Collection
article
Article
NUTN IR
IR
Search For:
Clear Search Box
Search in:
article
Or hit Enter to replace search target
Or select another collection:
Search in:
article
Advanced Search
Browse Search
This feature requires javascript
Show Results with:
Search type
criteria input
that contain my query words
with my exact phrase
Show Results with:
Search type Index
criteria input
anywhere in the record
in the title
ISBN
ISSN
Show Results with:
in the title
Show Results with:
anywhere in the record
in the title
ISBN
ISSN
This feature requires javascript
Modern Versus Tradition: Are there two different approaches to reading of the Confucian classics?
Cheng, Chung-yi
Educational philosophy and theory, 2016-01, Vol.48 (1), p.106-118
[Peer Reviewed Journal]
Full text available
Citations
Cited by
View Online
Details
Reviews & Tags
Recommendations
More
Times Cited
This feature requires javascript
Actions
Add to e-Shelf
Remove from e-Shelf
E-mail
Print
Permalink
Citation
EndNote
Export RIS
This feature requires javascript
Title:
Modern Versus Tradition: Are there two different approaches to reading of the Confucian classics?
Author:
Cheng, Chung-yi
Subjects:
classicist approach
;
Confucianism
;
Confucianism in literature
;
Criticism
;
Criticism and interpretation
;
Educational History
;
Educational Philosophy
;
existential approach
;
historical approach
;
Individual Development
;
Persuasive Discourse
;
philosophical approach
;
Reading Comprehension
;
Reading Processes
;
Reading Strategies
;
Teaching Methods
;
the Confucian classics
;
Thinking Skills
Is Part Of:
Educational philosophy and theory, 2016-01, Vol.48 (1), p.106-118
Description:
How to read the Confucian Classics today? Scholars with philosophical training usually emphasize that the philosophical approach, in comparison with the classicist and historical ones, is the best way to read the Confucian Classics, for it can dig out as much intellectual resources as possible from the classical texts in order to show their modern relevance. Briefly, the philosophical approach runs as follows: (1) first, to discover or identify the philosophical question inhered in the text; (2) then to reconstruct the line of thinking, reasoning, and argumentation revealed in the text, which will lead to the answer of the question; and (3) finally evaluate the effectiveness of the answer by any possible criticism. In spite of the fact that the philosophical approach does help showing the Confucian classics are of great significance to modern people, some scholars seriously caution that this theorization would alienate Confucianism from its very practical concern about self-cultivation. Accordingly, traditional Confucian scholars adopted an existential approach to reading, that is using their personal experience to read, question, understand, and comprehend the meanings of the text, making their comprehension as something they find in themselves and thus will be at ease in it. So there seems to be a dichotomy between the modern philosophical approach and the traditional existential approach to reading of the Confucian Classics. In this paper, I shall argue that the dichotomy has never existed. In fact, traditional Confucian scholars read the Confucian canon in both the philosophical and existential ways. Song Confucian Zhu Xi's 'Method of Reading' is a case in point. I shall then argue that these two approaches should be irreducible and inseparable so as to form a proper way of reading as well as teaching the Confucian Classics today.
Publisher:
Routledge
Language:
English
Identifier:
ISSN: 0013-1857
ISSN: 1469-5812
EISSN: 1469-5812
DOI: 10.1080/00131857.2015.1084219
Source:
Academic Search Premier
ERIC
Taylor & Francis Social Science & Humanities and Science & Technology Library Database Model
Links
View record in ERIC
View this record in NLNZ
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Back to results list
Previous
Result
9
Next
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait
Searching for
in
primo_central_multiple_fe
Show me what you have so far
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript