skip to main content
顯示結果: 查詢種類 顯示結果: 查詢種類 索引

The ethics of interrogation and the American Psychological Association: a critique of policy and process

Olson, Brad ; Soldz, Stephen ; Davis, Martha

Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM, 2008-01, Vol.3 (1), p.3-3 [同儕審閱期刊]

可取得全文

引用 被引用
  • 題名:
    The ethics of interrogation and the American Psychological Association: a critique of policy and process
  • 著者: Olson, Brad ; Soldz, Stephen ; Davis, Martha
  • 主題: Detention of persons ; Human Rights ; Humans ; National security ; Practice ; Prisoners - psychology ; Psychological aspects ; Psychologists ; Psychology - ethics ; Psychology, Military - ethics ; Security Measures - ethics ; Societies, Scientific ; Terrorism ; Torture - ethics ; United States
  • 所屬期刊: Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM, 2008-01, Vol.3 (1), p.3-3
  • 描述: The Psychological Ethics and National Security (PENS) task force was assembled by the American Psychological Association (APA) to guide policy on the role of psychologists in interrogations at foreign detention centers for the purpose of U.S. national security. The task force met briefly in 2005, and its report was quickly accepted by the APA Board of Directors and deemed consistent with the APA Ethics Code by the APA Ethics Committee. This rapid acceptance was unusual for a number of reasons but primarily because of the APA's long-standing tradition of taking great care in developing ethical policies that protected anyone who might be impacted by the work of psychologists. Many psychological and non-governmental organizations (NGOs), as well as reputable journalists, believed the risk of harm associated with psychologist participation in interrogations at these detention centers was not adequately addressed by the report. The present critique analyzes the assumptions of the PENS report and its interpretations of the APA Ethics Code. We demonstrate that it presents only one (and not particularly representative) side of a complex set of ethical issues. We conclude with a discussion of more appropriate psychological contributions to national security and world peace that better respect and preserve human rights.
  • 出版者: England: BioMed Central Ltd
  • 語言: 英文
  • 識別號: ISSN: 1747-5341
    EISSN: 1747-5341
    DOI: 10.1186/1747-5341-3-3
    PMID: 18230171
  • 資源來源: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals

正在檢索遠程資料庫,請稍等