skip to main content
Primo Search
Search in: 館藏
資源種類 顯示結果: 顯示結果: 查詢種類 索引

教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力之研究-以台南縣國小籃球選手為例

沈盈宏; Shen, Ying-hung 李國華; Guo-Hua Li; 體育學系教學碩士班 2010

線上取得

  • 題名:
    教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力之研究-以台南縣國小籃球選手為例
  • 著者: 沈盈宏; Shen, Ying-hung
  • 李國華; Guo-Hua Li; 體育學系教學碩士班
  • 主題: 籃球選手; 教練領導行為; 團隊凝聚力; basket players; coaching leadership behavior; team cohesion
  • 描述: 本研究的目的旨在探討台南縣國小籃球選手知覺教練的領導行為與團隊凝聚力,依不同背景變項統計變數對所知覺的教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力進行差異的分析,來描述分析台南縣國小籃球選手知覺教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力的現況與特性。本研究以參加台南縣九十八學年度國小籃球秋季聯賽學校之籃球選手為研究對象,研究工具包括個人基本資料、教練領導行為量表及團隊凝聚力量表三個部分,合計發出問卷380份,回收之有效樣本共302份,有效樣本率為79.4%。所得資料經描述性統計、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析及事後比較檢定、逐步多元迴歸等統計方法分析資料,所得結果歸納如下:一、不同背景變項之台南縣國小籃球選手在知覺教練領導行為上有顯著差異。其中以「性別」、「與教練相處年數」等背景變項在知覺教練領導行為上有顯著差異。二、不同背景變項台南縣國小籃球選手在團隊凝聚力有顯著差異。其中以「年級」、「與教練相處年數」等背景變項在團隊凝聚力上有顯著差異。三、台南縣國小籃球選手在知覺教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力的相關情形,教練領導行為之五個構面與團隊凝聚力,除「專制行為」外,都呈現顯著正相關;亦即教練對球員的「關懷」、「訓練與指導」、「民主」及「獎勵」行為越多,其團隊凝聚力愈高。四、台南縣國小籃球選手在知覺教練領導行為對團隊凝聚力之預測分析,由結果得知,教練對學生的「關懷」、「訓練與指導」及「民主」行為越多,其團隊凝聚力愈高。
    The purpose of this study was to investigate Tainan County primary school basketball players’ perception of coaching leadership behavior and team cohesion. Gap analysis and ANOVA were adopted to examine the characteristics of their perception and the relationship between coaching behavior and team cohesion. .The subjects of this study were the basketball players in Tainan County Primary School Fall League, School Years 2008---2009. Research tools consisted of personal data, coaching leadership behavior scale and team cohesion scale. 380 questionnaires were distributed, and 302 valid samples were collected; the valid sample rate was 79.4%. Data collected from the samples were analyzed with descriptive statistics, the independent t test, One-way ANOVA, post-hoc analysis and stepwise multiple regression. The results were as follows.1. On perceiving coaching leadership behavior, notable difference is available among basketball players in the variances of “sex” and “the years spent with the coach.”2. On perceiving team cohesion, notable difference is present among basketball players in the variances of “grade” and “the years spent with the coach.”3. As for the relationship between coaching leadership behavior and team cohesion, all the five aspects of behavior but “arbitrariness” are positively related to team cohesion. That is to say, the more a coach shows his/her “care,” “training and instruction,” “democracy” and “reward” to his/her players, the higher team cohesion will be.4. As for the influence of coaching leadership behavior on team cohesion, the prediction and analysis show that “care,” “training and instruction” and “democracy” are positively related to team cohesion. The more these three aspects are, the higher team cohesion will be.
    碩士
  • 建立日期: 2010
  • 格式: 121 bytes
    text/html
  • 語言: 中文
  • 識別號: http://nutnr.lib.nutn.edu.tw/handle/987654321/2311
  • 資源來源: NUTN IR

正在檢索遠程資料庫,請稍等