skip to main content

研究生生活壓力及其因應策略之研究

郭苹渝; Kuo, Ping-yu 歐慧敏; Hui-min Ou; 教育經營與管理研究所碩士班 2008

線上取得

  • 題名:
    研究生生活壓力及其因應策略之研究
  • 著者: 郭苹渝; Kuo, Ping-yu
  • 歐慧敏; Hui-min Ou; 教育經營與管理研究所碩士班
  • 主題: 生活壓力; 因應策略; 研究生; graduate students; life stress; coping strategy
  • 描述: 本研究旨在探討研究生生活壓力現況及面對生活壓力時所採行的因應策略。本研究使用「研究生生活壓力與因應策略調查問卷」為研究工具,以台灣南部地區大學院校教育學類日間部碩士班學生作為研究對象,共發出700份問卷,其中有效問卷為548份。所得資料以描述統計、獨立樣本t考驗、單因子變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關及典型相關等方法進行統計分析。 根據研究結果,本研究之結論如下:一、 研究生生活壓力感受介於有些壓力到中等壓力之間,其中以「時間管理壓力」感受最高,「人際關係壓力」感受最低。二、 不同身分別、年齡、年級及婚姻狀況的研究生在生活壓力上有顯著差異。全職生研究生生活壓力大於在職生;25歲以下(含25歲)研究生生活壓力大於25歲以上的研究生;「一年級」的研究生,其整體生活壓力高於「二年級」及「三年級以上」的研究生,且不同年級的研究生在「經濟壓力」、「人際關係壓力」、「自我期許壓力」及「生涯發展與規劃壓力」等層面上有顯著差異;未婚研究生生活壓力大於已婚研究生。三、 研究生在面對生活壓力時,以「解決問題」因應策略使用頻率最高,「暫時擱置」因應策略使用頻率最低。四、 不同身分別、年齡、性別、年級及婚姻狀況的研究生在壓力因應策略使用上有顯著差異。「全職生」使用「尋求支援」及「暫時擱置」壓力因應策略的頻率高於「在職生」;「25歲以上」研究生使用「解決問題」及「紓解緊張」壓力因應策略的頻率高於「25歲以下(含25歲)」研究生;「女性」研究生在使用「尋求支援」因應策略的頻率高於「男性」研究生,「男性」研究生在使用「紓解緊張」因應策略的頻率高於「女性」研究生;「一年級」及「三年級以上」的研究生在使用因應策略的頻率高於「二年級」研究生;「已婚」研究生使用「解決問題」及「紓解緊張」的頻率高於「未婚」研究生,而「未婚」研究生使用「暫時擱置」的頻率高於「已婚」研究生。五、 整體生活壓力與「暫時擱置」、「紓解緊張」兩個因應策略層面,達到顯著相關。六、 研究生生活壓力與因應策略有四個典型因素存在。
    The aim of this research is to study the life stress and stress coping strategies of graduate students. The instrument applied in this study is “The questionnaire of life stress and coping strategy of graduate students” . The subjects are graduate students of region universities and colleges pedagogy day division Master in south Taiwan. 700 questionnaires were sent out and 548 are valid. The data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, independent sample t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson product-moment correlation, and Canonical correlation. According to the statistic result, the conclusions are:1. The life stress of the students is moderate in which the time management is the highest and relationship stress is the lowest. 2. Staff difference, age, grade level, and marriage status have significant effect on graduate students’ life stress. The whole life stress of full-time graduate students is significantly higher than on-the-job studends. The whole life stress of under 25 graduate students is significantly higher than over 25 ones. The whole life stress of first year graduate students is significantly higher than second year and over third year ones. Different grade level have significant effect on economic stress, relationship stress, self-expect stress, and career development stress. The whole life stress of single students is significantly higher than married ones.3. The frequency of using coping strategies is moderate in which “problem-solving” is used most and “impermanent to leave aside” is used least.4. There is significant difference in the use of coping strategies between students of different staff , age, gender, grade level, and marriage status. The full-time graduate students used “seeking support” and “impermanent to leave aside” strategies significantly more than on-the-job studends. The over 25 graduate students used“problem-solving” and “tension reduction” strategies significantly more than under 25 ones. The female graduate students are likely to employ “seeking support” strategies more frequently than male studends; the male graduate students are likely to employ“tension reduction” strategies more frequently than female studends. The first year graduate students and over third year ones used coping strategies significantly more than second year ones. The married graduate students are likely to employ “problem-solving” and “tension reduction” strategies more frequently than single ones; the single graduate students are likely to employ “impermanent to leave aside” strategies more frequently than married ones.5. The life stress have significant correlations with the dimension “impermanent to leave aside” and “tension reduction” .6. There are four canonical factors between the dimensions of life stress and coping strategies.
    碩士
  • 建立日期: 2008
  • 格式: 121 bytes
    text/html
  • 語言: 中文
  • 識別號: http://nutnr.lib.nutn.edu.tw/handle/987654321/3310
  • 資源來源: NUTN IR

正在檢索遠程資料庫,請稍等