skip to main content
Primo Advanced Search
Primo Advanced Search Query Term
Primo Advanced Search prefilters

國小學童在網路專題導向式學習環境中溝通網絡及討論問題之模式

蘇家德; Su, Chia-te 李建億; Chien-I Lee; 資訊教育研究所教學碩士班 2003

線上取得

  • 題名:
    國小學童在網路專題導向式學習環境中溝通網絡及討論問題之模式
  • 著者: 蘇家德; Su, Chia-te
  • 李建億; Chien-I Lee; 資訊教育研究所教學碩士班
  • 主題: 溝通網絡; 網路專題導向學習環境; communication network; net project-based learning environment
  • 描述: 近年來,專題導向學習已成為廣被重視採用的學習方式,並且在網路上,進行網路專題導向學習,也已有相當的成果。專題導向學習強調合作、探討、分析與成果展示。小組學習活動也強調不斷與同儕合作、進行調查活動,在互動的過程中學習相關知識及技能。許多研究顯示合作學習的互動頻率及複雜度越高效果越好。因此,本研究的目的,旨在探討網路專題導向學習活動中,合作群組內學習者的溝通歷程,及其對學習成效的影響為何。本研究採用以Krajciket等學者所提出的理論為基礎,來建置一網路專題學習系統,並以高雄市、台南縣、台南市等六所國小六年級學生為施測對象。學習活動進行中,透由系統自動記錄學習者的即時與非即時的溝通歷程,用以發掘其溝通網絡的模式;另外,再以內容分析法來分析學生討論問題之架構。研究發現:「不同學習成效」小組在大部分的項度中幾乎無差別。學生在網路專題學習中溝通內容以社交性為主,真正與學習有關的溝通內容則不到兩成,「高學習成效」小組在「語意辯證」上以「證明」較佳,中、低學習成效小組則在「回應」較佳;至於在溝通網絡方面,「高學習成效」小組在溝通網絡上,傾向「私黨或破碎溝通」的型態,而「低學習成效」小組則傾向「近理想的溝通」。
    Project-based learning is more popular in the recently year. The apply in Project-based learning is fruitful results. Project-based learning emphasizes collaboration, probing, analysis and outcome display. Collaboration with mates, investigation, and learning about the information and skills by the interaction are stressed in group learning. In plenty of researches, tell us the more frequency and the higher complication collaboration, the better effects will appear. The purpose of research includes, (1) Analysis learners’ communication process. (2) Distinguish difference learning effect groups. This research collected 72 students from 6 primary schools in Tainan County, Tainan City and Kaohsiung City. Automatically, the Project-based learning system will record learning log in the learning process. Based on content analysis approach to find student how to discuss. And base on network analysis approach to find communication network. From the research I discovered that: There is almost no differences at many items between which are in different learning effects effects groups. Most of communication contents are apt to ”social” in the Net PBL. And concerning about learning is less than 20%. The ‘high learning effect’ groups prevail in ”proof”, whereas the “middle learning groups” & “low learning groups” prevails in “response”. As for the network, the “high learning effect” groups are apt to “Fragmented, cliques”. The “low learning effect” groups are apt to “approximately idea”.
    碩士
  • 建立日期: 2003
  • 格式: 121 bytes
    text/html
  • 語言: 中文
  • 識別號: http://nutnr.lib.nutn.edu.tw/handle/987654321/5195
  • 資源來源: NUTN IR

正在檢索遠程資料庫,請稍等