skip to main content
訪客
個人書架
我的帳戶
登出
登入
This feature requires javascript
檢索首頁
圖書館首頁
電子期刊
引用參考文獻查詢
指定參考書查詢
新書通報
標籤查詢
線上輔助
語言:
English
繁體中文
This feature required javascript
This feature requires javascript
Primo Search
館藏+文章
館藏+文章
館藏
查館藏
文章
查文章
機構典藏
機構典藏
Search For:
Clear Search Box
Search in:
館藏+文章
Or hit Enter to replace search target
Or select another collection:
Search in:
館藏+文章
進階檢索
瀏覽查詢
This feature requires javascript
資源種類
criteria input
圖書
期刊
視聽資料
全部館藏
顯示結果:
criteria input
包含在我的檢索語句內
完全相同
起始以
顯示結果:
查詢種類 索引
criteria input
任何地方
題名
ISBN
ISSN
Show Results with:
題名
Show Results with:
任何地方
題名
ISBN
ISSN
This feature requires javascript
Assessment of Li 利 in the Mencius and the Mozi
Chiu, Wai Wai
Dao : a journal of comparative philosophy, 2014-06, Vol.13 (2), p.199-214
[同儕審閱期刊]
可取得全文
引用
被引用
線上檢視
詳細格式
評論和標籤
相關文章推薦
FullText@NUTN
引用次數
This feature requires javascript
傳送到
加入個人書架
從個人書架中移除
E-mail
列印
永久連結
引用
EndNote
導出 RiS
This feature requires javascript
題名:
Assessment of Li 利 in the Mencius and the Mozi
著者:
Chiu, Wai Wai
主題:
Chinese
;
Education
;
Ethics
;
Non-Western Philosophy
;
Philosophy
;
Philosophy of Religion
;
Religious Studies
所屬期刊:
Dao : a journal of comparative philosophy, 2014-06, Vol.13 (2), p.199-214
描述:
The attitude toward li 利 is often identified as a key difference between the Mencius 孟子 and the Mozi 墨子. A common view is that for the Mencius , rightness ( yi 義) and li are incompatible; but for the Mozi they are not necessarily so. In this paper I argue that the Mencius and the Mozi are in broad agreement on the issue of li , and their attitudes toward li are not as different as may seem at first glance. If we take a finer-grained understanding of li in two ways, namely the self-regarding li and the other-regarding li , then both the Mencius and the Mozi would criticize the former but encourage the latter. The term li in the Mencius has a range of meanings, and it is not clear whether the Mencius actually opposes all li -pursuing activities. Mencius would agree with Mozi that, at least in some cases, one is obligated to seek li for others. Furthermore, despite their criticism of self-regarding li , both Mencius and Mozi allow that in some cases it is morally permissible to act from the motive of self-regarding li , as long as this motive coexists with the motive of rightness. That is, self-regarding li and rightness are not always mutually exclusive, even for Mencius, who seems to be more critical of li .
出版者:
Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands
語言:
英文
識別號:
ISSN: 1540-3009
EISSN: 1569-7274
DOI: 10.1007/s11712-014-9372-3
資源來源:
SpringerLink Journals AutoHoldings
OmniFile Full Text Select (H.W. Wilson)
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
返回到檢索清單
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
正在檢索遠程資料庫,請稍等
查詢:
在
scope:("NUTN"),scope:(NUTN_ALEPH),scope:(NUTN_IR),scope:(NUTN_SFX),primo_central_multiple_fe
顯示現有記錄
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript