skip to main content
訪客
個人書架
我的帳戶
登出
登入
This feature requires javascript
檢索首頁
圖書館首頁
電子期刊
引用參考文獻查詢
指定參考書查詢
新書通報
標籤查詢
線上輔助
語言:
English
繁體中文
This feature required javascript
This feature requires javascript
Primo Search
館藏+文章
館藏+文章
館藏
查館藏
文章
查文章
機構典藏
機構典藏
Search For:
Clear Search Box
Search in:
館藏+文章
Or hit Enter to replace search target
Or select another collection:
Search in:
館藏+文章
進階檢索
瀏覽查詢
This feature requires javascript
資源種類
criteria input
圖書
期刊
視聽資料
全部館藏
顯示結果:
criteria input
包含在我的檢索語句內
完全相同
起始以
顯示結果:
查詢種類 索引
criteria input
任何地方
題名
ISBN
ISSN
Show Results with:
題名
Show Results with:
任何地方
題名
ISBN
ISSN
This feature requires javascript
Religious diversity,
ecology
and grammar
Kroesbergen, Hermen
Hervormde teologiese studies, 2020, Vol.76 (1), p.1-11
[同儕審閱期刊]
可取得全文
引用
被引用
線上檢視
詳細格式
評論和標籤
相關文章推薦
FullText@NUTN
引用次數
This feature requires javascript
傳送到
加入個人書架
從個人書架中移除
E-mail
列印
永久連結
引用
EndNote
導出 RiS
This feature requires javascript
題名:
Religious diversity,
ecology
and grammar
著者:
Kroesbergen, Hermen
主題:
Charters
;
Christianity
;
Cooperation
;
Ecology
;
ecotheology
;
Environmental aspects
;
Grammar
;
Hick, John
;
john hick
;
Language
;
ludwig wittgenstein
;
Moltmann, Jurgen
;
Multiculturalism & pluralism
;
nature religions
;
Paganism & animism
;
Religion
;
Religions
;
Religious aspects
;
religious pluralism
;
Theologians
;
Theology
所屬期刊:
Hervormde teologiese studies, 2020, Vol.76 (1), p.1-11
描述:
We do not need 'the earth' as the space for encounter and cooperation between world religions in the way Moltmann suggests. Firstly, this fails to do justice to the contemporary situation concerning religious diversity: people from different religions have no problem in working together either for promoting ecological goals or for fighting them together. Within religions, there are often greater divergences between eco-friendly and anti-ecological adherents of that same religion. Secondly, Moltmann's proposal misguidedly confuses boundaries of beliefs and boundaries of grammar concerning religious diversity. Paying attention to religions as grammar provides a more accurate picture of the reality concerning world religions from an ecological perspective. In the final section of this article, I present some suggestions on moving forward in the debate about
ecology
from within this new perspective. We need to keep in mind that it is not religions but people who have opinions about
ecology
. The dialogue that needs to take place is not a high-level bureaucratic one between officials of different religions but one between people. In this grassroots-level discussion, it is important to listen to the other person rather than to consider him or her as a representative of his or her religion. We should not allow people to claim an entire religion for their position, dismissing others as revisionists. Religions are grammars that can express both eco-friendly and anti-ecological messages. Contribution: This article contributes to an in-depth understanding of religious diversity; it proves the usefulness of the distinction between grammar and beliefs in the study of religion and demonstrates this using the case of ecotheology as an example.
出版者:
Pretoria: AOSIS
語言:
英文;葡文;南非文
識別號:
ISSN: 0259-9422
ISSN: 2072-8050
EISSN: 2072-8050
DOI: 10.4102/hts.v76i1.6064
資源來源:
Publicly Available Content Database
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
返回到檢索清單
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
正在檢索遠程資料庫,請稍等
查詢:
在
scope:("NUTN"),scope:(NUTN_ALEPH),scope:(NUTN_IR),scope:(NUTN_SFX),primo_central_multiple_fe
顯示現有記錄
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript