skip to main content
訪客
個人書架
我的帳戶
登出
登入
This feature requires javascript
檢索首頁
圖書館首頁
電子期刊
引用參考文獻查詢
指定參考書查詢
新書通報
標籤查詢
線上輔助
語言:
English
繁體中文
This feature required javascript
This feature requires javascript
Primo Search
館藏+文章
館藏+文章
館藏
查館藏
文章
查文章
機構典藏
機構典藏
Search For:
Clear Search Box
Search in:
館藏+文章
Or hit Enter to replace search target
Or select another collection:
Search in:
館藏+文章
進階檢索
瀏覽查詢
This feature requires javascript
資源種類
criteria input
圖書
期刊
視聽資料
全部館藏
顯示結果:
criteria input
包含在我的檢索語句內
完全相同
起始以
顯示結果:
查詢種類 索引
criteria input
任何地方
題名
ISBN
ISSN
Show Results with:
題名
Show Results with:
任何地方
題名
ISBN
ISSN
This feature requires javascript
Morgan
,
Robert
P
. 2014. Becoming Heinrich Schenker: Music Theory and Ideology. New York: Cambridge University Press
Bryan Parkhurst
Current musicology, 2014-09 (98)
[同儕審閱期刊]
可取得全文
引用
被引用
線上檢視
詳細格式
評論和標籤
相關文章推薦
FullText@NUTN
引用次數
This feature requires javascript
傳送到
加入個人書架
從個人書架中移除
E-mail
列印
永久連結
引用
EndNote
導出 RiS
This feature requires javascript
題名:
Morgan
,
Robert
P
. 2014. Becoming Heinrich Schenker: Music Theory and Ideology. New York: Cambridge University Press
著者:
Bryan Parkhurst
所屬期刊:
Current musicology, 2014-09 (98)
描述:
In my view, there is a real need for the kind of book that
Robert
Morgan’s Heinrich Schenker: Music Theory and Ideology aspires to be: a succinct, lucid, and sympathetic summary of the most important works of the most important music theorist, one that shows how those works comprise an integrated theoretical program, a “complete, self–enclosed system” (14)— in a word, a Wissenschaft. Needless to say, this is in many circles no longer seen as a fashionable, or even remotely credible, way of doing intellectual history. A backward glance at the last few decades of developments in music studies leaves one with the impression that the project of rational reconstruction died a mostly unmourned death when Dahlhaus died a premature death in 1989.1 But “Schenkerism,” as Narmour dubbed it, has always been a flagrantly, joyfully, and (in large part) self–consciously unfashionable “ism,” even (or especially) back when Schenker was figuring out how to be a Schenkerian. And, in the case of a temporally and culturally remote, sometimes willfully opaque, unfailingly cantankerous thinker like Schenker, reconstruction—which blends the exegete’s task of making a text as comprehensible as possible with the advocate’s task of making it as convincing and relevant as possible—is arguably a necessary precondition for anything resembling deconstruction, however important and edifying that hermeneutic occupation may be. Thus I side with Morgan on a fundamental level, in that I think his book aims at a target worth aiming at. Many in the field will disagree. So be it; I’m happy to submit the opinion as a minority report. On this point, however, I anticipate consensus: Morgan fails to hit his target’s bull’s–eye. While there is plenty to be learned from Becoming Heinrich Schenker, and while everyone who likes to think about Schenker should read it (faute de mieux), I have reservations about how successfully it prosecutes the goals it sets for itself. In what follows, I will use the three components of the book’s title—“Becoming Heinrich Schenker,” “Music Theory,” and “Ideology”—to orient my criticisms and substantiate this verdict. In music theory, and Schenker studies in particular, one finds countercurrents to this trend, notably in the work of Matthew Brown and Mark DeBellis. ↵
出版者:
Columbia University Libraries
語言:
英文
識別號:
EISSN: 2640-883X
DOI: 10.7916/cm.v0i98.5336
資源來源:
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
返回到檢索清單
前一個記錄
檢索清單
8
下ㄧ個記錄
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
正在檢索遠程資料庫,請稍等
查詢:
在
scope:("NUTN"),scope:(NUTN_ALEPH),scope:(NUTN_IR),scope:(NUTN_SFX),primo_central_multiple_fe
顯示現有記錄
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript