skip to main content
訪客
個人書架
我的帳戶
登出
登入
This feature requires javascript
檢索首頁
圖書館首頁
電子期刊
引用參考文獻查詢
指定參考書查詢
新書通報
標籤查詢
線上輔助
語言:
English
繁體中文
This feature required javascript
This feature requires javascript
Primo Search
館藏+文章
館藏+文章
館藏
查館藏
文章
查文章
機構典藏
機構典藏
Search For:
Clear Search Box
Search in:
館藏+文章
Or hit Enter to replace search target
Or select another collection:
Search in:
館藏+文章
進階檢索
瀏覽查詢
This feature requires javascript
資源種類
criteria input
圖書
期刊
視聽資料
全部館藏
顯示結果:
criteria input
包含在我的檢索語句內
完全相同
起始以
顯示結果:
查詢種類 索引
criteria input
任何地方
題名
ISBN
ISSN
Show Results with:
題名
Show Results with:
任何地方
題名
ISBN
ISSN
This feature requires javascript
Alternative Facts in Musicology and Vechnaya Pamyat' in Shostakovich's Symphony No. 5
Mah, Eileen
Current musicology, 2021-03, Vol.108 (108), p.81-114
[同儕審閱期刊]
可取得全文
引用
被引用
線上檢視
詳細格式
評論和標籤
相關文章推薦
FullText@NUTN
引用次數
This feature requires javascript
傳送到
加入個人書架
從個人書架中移除
E-mail
列印
永久連結
引用
EndNote
導出 RiS
This feature requires javascript
題名:
Alternative Facts in Musicology and Vechnaya Pamyat' in Shostakovich's Symphony No. 5
著者:
Mah, Eileen
主題:
Bias
;
Debates
;
Elections
;
Music
;
Musicology
;
Presidents
;
Taruskin
, Richard
;
War
所屬期刊:
Current musicology, 2021-03, Vol.108 (108), p.81-114
描述:
The assertions, refutations, and counter-refutations concerning two core pieces of Richard Taruskin’s studies on Russian music—Tchaikovsky’s Symphony No. 6 and Shostakovich’s Symphony No. 5—provide a starting point for discussion about the possibilities, limits, and obligations of musicological interpretation. Moreover, an important aspect of the discussion is the phenomenon of “alternative facts,” both in publication and in pedagogy, and possibly in music itself.
Taruskin
argues against the logical fallacies of overly specific or overly simplistic interpretations, but hesitates to fully interpret certain music himself, thereby participating in the web of alternative facts.
Taruskin
refutes popular myths about biographical meanings in Tchaikovsky’s symphony, but in so doing, also seems to reject a tragic reading of any kind. He explains away various musical structures and extroversive references, but fails to explore why those elements are in fact present. As for Shostakovich’s symphony, Taruskin notes its saturation with musical topics, but ignores their allusive specificity, downplaying their significance altogether for what he calls their transferability. Yet Taruskin himself identifies an allusion to a specific Orthodox hymn, and therefrom draws specific conclusions. His evidence for calling the passage a “literal imitation” is actually flawed, but a truly literal quotation of this very hymn may be present throughout the entire symphony, and may act as a sort of species of alternative fact itself. In any case, something that specific, and its placement in the symphonic structure, deserve notice and demand specificity of interpretation.
出版者:
New York: Columbia University, Department of Music
語言:
英文
識別號:
ISSN: 0011-3735
EISSN: 2640-883X
DOI: 10.52214/cm.v108i.7176
資源來源:
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
返回到檢索清單
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
正在檢索遠程資料庫,請稍等
查詢:
在
scope:("NUTN"),scope:(NUTN_ALEPH),scope:(NUTN_IR),scope:(NUTN_SFX),primo_central_multiple_fe
顯示現有記錄
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript