skip to main content
訪客
個人書架
我的帳戶
登出
登入
This feature requires javascript
檢索首頁
圖書館首頁
電子期刊
引用參考文獻查詢
指定參考書查詢
新書通報
標籤查詢
線上輔助
語言:
English
繁體中文
This feature required javascript
This feature requires javascript
Primo Search
館藏+文章
館藏+文章
館藏
查館藏
文章
查文章
機構典藏
機構典藏
Search For:
Clear Search Box
Search in:
文章
Or hit Enter to replace search target
Or select another collection:
Search in:
文章
進階檢索
瀏覽查詢
This feature requires javascript
顯示結果:
查詢種類
criteria input
包含在我的檢索語句內
完全相同
顯示結果:
查詢種類 索引
criteria input
任何地方
題名
ISBN
ISSN
Show Results with:
題名
Show Results with:
任何地方
題名
ISBN
ISSN
This feature requires javascript
Modern Versus Tradition: Are there two different approaches to reading of the Confucian classics?
Cheng, Chung-yi
Educational philosophy and theory, 2016-01, Vol.48 (1), p.106-118
[同儕審閱期刊]
可取得全文
引用
被引用
線上檢視
詳細格式
評論和標籤
相關文章推薦
FullText@NUTN
引用次數
This feature requires javascript
傳送到
加入個人書架
從個人書架中移除
E-mail
列印
永久連結
引用
EndNote
導出 RiS
This feature requires javascript
題名:
Modern Versus Tradition: Are there two different approaches to reading of the Confucian classics?
著者:
Cheng, Chung-yi
主題:
Classical texts
;
classicist approach
;
Confucianism
;
Confucianism in literature
;
Criticism
;
Criticism and interpretation
;
Cultivation
;
Educational History
;
Educational Philosophy
;
existential approach
;
Existentialism
;
historical approach
;
Individual Development
;
Persuasive Discourse
;
philosophical approach
;
Reading
;
Reading Comprehension
;
Reading Processes
;
Reading Strategies
;
Teaching
;
Teaching Methods
;
the Confucian classics
;
Thinking Skills
所屬期刊:
Educational philosophy and theory, 2016-01, Vol.48 (1), p.106-118
描述:
How to read the Confucian Classics today? Scholars with philosophical training usually emphasize that the philosophical approach, in comparison with the classicist and historical ones, is the best way to read the Confucian Classics, for it can dig out as much intellectual resources as possible from the classical texts in order to show their modern relevance. Briefly, the philosophical approach runs as follows: (1) first, to discover or identify the philosophical question inhered in the text; (2) then to reconstruct the line of thinking, reasoning, and argumentation revealed in the text, which will lead to the answer of the question; and (3) finally evaluate the effectiveness of the answer by any possible criticism. In spite of the fact that the philosophical approach does help showing the Confucian classics are of great significance to modern people, some scholars seriously caution that this theorization would alienate Confucianism from its very practical concern about self-cultivation. Accordingly, traditional Confucian scholars adopted an existential approach to reading, that is using their personal experience to read, question, understand, and comprehend the meanings of the text, making their comprehension as something they find in themselves and thus will be at ease in it. So there seems to be a dichotomy between the modern philosophical approach and the traditional existential approach to reading of the Confucian Classics. In this paper, I shall argue that the dichotomy has never existed. In fact, traditional Confucian scholars read the Confucian canon in both the philosophical and existential ways. Song Confucian Zhu Xi's 'Method of Reading' is a case in point. I shall then argue that these two approaches should be irreducible and inseparable so as to form a proper way of reading as well as teaching the Confucian Classics today.
出版者:
Abingdon: Routledge
語言:
英文
識別號:
ISSN: 0013-1857
ISSN: 1469-5812
EISSN: 1469-5812
DOI: 10.1080/00131857.2015.1084219
資源來源:
EBSCOhost Academic Search Premier
ERIC
Taylor & Francis Social Science & Humanities and Science & Technology Library Database Model
連結
View record in ERIC
View this record in NLNZ
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
返回到檢索清單
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
正在檢索遠程資料庫,請稍等
查詢:
在
primo_central_multiple_fe
顯示現有記錄
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript