skip to main content
Guest
e-Shelf
My Account
Sign out
Sign in
This feature requires javascript
Library Search
Library Home
A-Z
Citation Linker
Course Reserves
New Books
Tags
Help
Language:
English
Chinese
This feature required javascript
This feature requires javascript
Primo Advanced Search
Primo Local Repository
Library Collection + Article
ILS ALEPH
Library Collection
article
Article
NUTN IR
IR
Primo Advanced Search Query Term
Input search text:
Show Results with:
criteria input
contains
is (exact)
starts with
Show Results with:
criteria input
Any
in the title
ISBN
ISSN
Show Results with:
in the title
Show Results with:
Any
in the title
ISBN
ISSN
Primo Advanced Search prefilters
Material Type:
criteria input
eBooks
eJournals
Audio Visual
All items
Primo Local Repository
Simple Search
This feature requires javascript
質量爭鋒:教育研究法的過去、現在與未來
黃秀文
Journal of Education Research (Print), 2013-11, p.102-117
Full text available
View all versions
Citations
Cited by
View Online
Details
Reviews & Tags
Recommendations
More
Times Cited
This feature requires javascript
Actions
Add to e-Shelf
Remove from e-Shelf
E-mail
Print
Permalink
Citation
EndNote
Export RIS
This feature requires javascript
Title:
質量爭鋒:教育研究法的過去、現在與未來
Author:
黃秀文
Subjects:
educational research methods
;
qualitative research
;
quantitative research
;
教
育
研
究
法
;
質性
研
究
;
量化
研
究
Is Part Of:
Journal of Education Research (Print), 2013-11, p.102-117
Description:
本文探討質量研究在教育研究法領域的發展情形及所處的角色地位。在過去,典範論戰引發質量研究的分立對峙。而現在,官方支持的「科學本位研究」貶抑質性研究為非「科學」,這使得質量研究的論戰再起。此外,質量混合研究的崛起以及研究典範的增生,也是現今教育研究法的特色。在未來,本文臆測量化研究、質性研究與混合研究應會並立發展,而無所謂誰取代誰的現象。至於是否有超越傳統質量研究的新研究取向出現,以及質量研究是否可能真正聚合為一,這些也將是未來教育研究法領域可待觀察的發展
This article investigates the development and status of qualitative and quantitative research in education. In the past, paradigm war induced qualitative and quantitative research to be opposed to each other. At present, "scientifically based research" supported by the government rejects qualitative research as "science" , and this leads the resurgence of argumentation between qualitative and quantitative research. In addition, the rise of mixed methods and the proliferation of paradigms also characterize nowadays educational research methods. For the future, the article conjectures that quantitative research, qualitative research, and mixed methods will advance together, instead of the replacement of one method by another. As for whether a new research approach will emerge to overtak
Publisher:
台灣: 高等
教
育
文化事業有限公司
Language:
Chinese
Identifier:
ISSN: 1680-6360
Source:
Alma/SFX Local Collection
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Back to results list
Previous
Result
10
Next
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait
Searching for
in
scope:("NUTN"),scope:(NUTN_ALEPH),scope:(NUTN_IR),scope:(NUTN_SFX),primo_central_multiple_fe
Show me what you have so far
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript