skip to main content
訪客
個人書架
我的帳戶
登出
登入
This feature requires javascript
檢索首頁
圖書館首頁
電子期刊
引用參考文獻查詢
指定參考書查詢
新書通報
標籤查詢
線上輔助
語言:
English
繁體中文
This feature required javascript
This feature requires javascript
Primo Advanced Search
館藏+文章
館藏+文章
館藏
查館藏
文章
查文章
機構典藏
機構典藏
Primo Advanced Search Query Term
Input search text:
Show Results with:
criteria input
包括
等於
起始以
Show Results with:
criteria input
任何
題名
ISBN
ISSN
Show Results with:
題名
Show Results with:
任何
題名
ISBN
ISSN
Primo Advanced Search prefilters
資料類型
criteria input
圖書
期刊
視聽資料
全部館藏
館藏+文章
簡單檢索
This feature requires javascript
A Response to
Paul
Griffiths
’ Annihilationist Proposal
Brotherton, Joshua R.
Modern theology, 2021-01, Vol.37 (1), p.89-113
[同儕審閱期刊]
可取得全文
引用
被引用
線上檢視
詳細格式
評論和標籤
相關文章推薦
FullText@NUTN
引用次數
This feature requires javascript
傳送到
加入個人書架
從個人書架中移除
E-mail
列印
永久連結
引用
EndNote
導出 RiS
This feature requires javascript
題名:
A Response to
Paul
Griffiths
’ Annihilationist Proposal
著者:
Brotherton, Joshua R.
所屬期刊:
Modern theology, 2021-01, Vol.37 (1), p.89-113
描述:
In his recent influential theological work,
Paul
Griffiths
, the esteemed Buddhism scholar and Anglican convert to Catholicism, proposes, among other things, that annihilationism is a viable option for Christians, including Catholics, despite apparent magisterial prohibition. He argues, in effect, that every creature must be naturally mortal because bodily, including the angels. Therefore, de facto immortal creatures are not immortal by nature, but by a positive act of God in addition to the creative act. Accordingly, it makes no sense to assert the existence of an eternal hell. Rather, since sin is fundamentally corrosive, those who opt to continue down the rabbit's hole of sin literally become nothing. Hell, then, is a no‐place and a no‐time. Hence, as long as the damned continue to exist, they have the opportunity for eventual redemption as for eventual self‐annihilation.
Griffiths
attempts to defend this thesis in dialogue with Augustine, in particular, to the neglect of Aquinas, except to argue that Aquinas’ own arguments for the natural immortality of the human soul are incoherent. I will argue instead that spiritual being exists, that it is naturally immortal, that Aquinas demonstrates both, and that even an Augustinian such as Joseph Ratzinger recognizes Aquinas’ theological insights and builds on them.
出版者:
Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
語言:
英文
識別號:
ISSN: 0266-7177
EISSN: 1468-0025
DOI: 10.1111/moth.12594
資源來源:
Wiley Online Library All Journals
Academic Search Premier
Wiley Online Library Full Collection 2020
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
返回到檢索清單
前一個記錄
檢索清單
7
下ㄧ個記錄
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
正在檢索遠程資料庫,請稍等
查詢:
在
scope:("NUTN"),scope:(NUTN_ALEPH),scope:(NUTN_IR),scope:(NUTN_SFX),primo_central_multiple_fe
顯示現有記錄
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript