skip to main content
顯示結果: 查詢種類 顯示結果: 查詢種類 索引

In Defense of Chinese Sensibility: Confucian Aesthetics in the 20th Century

Lee, Su-san

Dao Companion to Contemporary Confucian Philosophy, p.513-540

可取得全文

引用 被引用
  • 題名:
    In Defense of Chinese Sensibility: Confucian Aesthetics in the 20th Century
  • 著者: Lee, Su-san
  • 所屬期刊: Dao Companion to Contemporary Confucian Philosophy, p.513-540
  • 描述: Contemporary Confucianism rose in response to the challenges of ever-expanding Western civilization in modern times. Under the banner of cultural nationalism, the aesthetics of contemporary Confucians could be considered a defense of traditional Chinese sensibility against the West and its iconoclastic Chinese followers. Although their approaches were diverse, these scholars resonated with each other in terms of their basic assumptions and final conclusions. From cosmological philosophy and political background to cultural foundation to empathetic feelings, they looked forward to a more balanced synthesis of Chinese heritages and western aesthetics, which proved a harder task than they had expected. For example, Thomé H. Fang compares the ancient Greeks and modern Europeans with the Chinese, arguing that the former two groups’ scientific perception of the universe is categorically different from the artistically constructed Chinese cosmology. Qian Mu alleges that the vastness of Chinese empire makes its literature and drama more universalistic in their appeal, unlike the provincial flavor of their European counterparts. Tang Junyi admires the splendor and sublimity of Western art and literature, but argues that Chinese sense of beauty is greater because of its empathy with nature and the world. By the same token, the study of Confucian theory of human nature and Daoist spirit of art makes Xu Fuguan critical of Western modern art. Last but not least, Mou Zongsan’s critique of Kant’s aesthetic theory illustrates that “the good” remains the top concern of all contemporary Confucians, whereas “the beautiful” (as well as “the true”) is only secondary or supplementary. The concept of “art for art’s sake” is unacceptable. Although these Confucians relied heavily on Western philosophy as a tool of analysis, the gap between the two cultures was yet to be bridged.
  • 相關題名: Dao Companions to Chinese Philosophy
  • 出版者: Cham: Springer International Publishing
  • 語言: 英文
  • 識別號: ISSN: 2211-0275
    ISBN: 3030564738
    ISBN: 9783030564735
    EISSN: 2542-8780
    EISBN: 9783030564759
    EISBN: 3030564754
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-56475-9_23
  • 資源來源: Springer Books

正在檢索遠程資料庫,請稍等