skip to main content
訪客
個人書架
我的帳戶
登出
登入
This feature requires javascript
檢索首頁
圖書館首頁
電子期刊
引用參考文獻查詢
指定參考書查詢
新書通報
標籤查詢
線上輔助
語言:
English
繁體中文
This feature required javascript
This feature requires javascript
Primo Search
館藏+文章
館藏+文章
館藏
查館藏
文章
查文章
機構典藏
機構典藏
Search For:
Clear Search Box
Search in:
文章
Or hit Enter to replace search target
Or select another collection:
Search in:
文章
進階檢索
瀏覽查詢
This feature requires javascript
顯示結果:
查詢種類
criteria input
包含在我的檢索語句內
完全相同
顯示結果:
查詢種類 索引
criteria input
任何地方
題名
ISBN
ISSN
Show Results with:
題名
Show Results with:
任何地方
題名
ISBN
ISSN
This feature requires javascript
In Defense of Chinese Sensibility: Confucian Aesthetics in the 20th Century
Lee, Su-san
Dao Companion to Contemporary Confucian Philosophy, p.513-540
可取得全文
引用
被引用
線上檢視
詳細格式
評論和標籤
相關文章推薦
FullText@NUTN
引用次數
This feature requires javascript
傳送到
加入個人書架
從個人書架中移除
E-mail
列印
永久連結
引用
EndNote
導出 RiS
This feature requires javascript
題名:
In Defense of Chinese Sensibility: Confucian Aesthetics in the 20th Century
著者:
Lee, Su-san
所屬期刊:
Dao Companion to Contemporary Confucian Philosophy, p.513-540
描述:
Contemporary Confucianism rose in response to the challenges of ever-expanding Western civilization in modern times. Under the banner of cultural nationalism, the aesthetics of contemporary Confucians could be considered a defense of traditional Chinese sensibility against the West and its iconoclastic Chinese followers. Although their approaches were diverse, these scholars resonated with each other in terms of their basic assumptions and final conclusions. From cosmological philosophy and political background to cultural foundation to empathetic feelings, they looked forward to a more balanced synthesis of Chinese heritages and western aesthetics, which proved a harder task than they had expected. For example, Thomé H. Fang compares the ancient Greeks and modern Europeans with the Chinese, arguing that the former two groups’ scientific perception of the universe is categorically different from the artistically constructed Chinese cosmology. Qian Mu alleges that the vastness of Chinese empire makes its literature and drama more universalistic in their appeal, unlike the provincial flavor of their European counterparts. Tang Junyi admires the splendor and sublimity of Western art and literature, but argues that Chinese sense of beauty is greater because of its empathy with nature and the world. By the same token, the study of Confucian theory of human nature and Daoist spirit of art makes Xu Fuguan critical of Western modern art. Last but not least, Mou Zongsan’s critique of Kant’s aesthetic theory illustrates that “the good” remains the top concern of all contemporary Confucians, whereas “the beautiful” (as well as “the true”) is only secondary or supplementary. The concept of “art for art’s sake” is unacceptable. Although these Confucians relied heavily on Western philosophy as a tool of analysis, the gap between the two cultures was yet to be bridged.
相關題名:
Dao Companions to Chinese Philosophy
出版者:
Cham: Springer International Publishing
語言:
英文
識別號:
ISSN: 2211-0275
ISBN: 3030564738
ISBN: 9783030564735
EISSN: 2542-8780
EISBN: 9783030564759
EISBN: 3030564754
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-56475-9_23
資源來源:
Springer Books
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
返回到檢索清單
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
正在檢索遠程資料庫,請稍等
查詢:
在
primo_central_multiple_fe
顯示現有記錄
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript