skip to main content
語言:
資源種類 顯示結果: 顯示結果: 查詢種類 索引

Priorities and opportunities in the application of the ecosystem services concept in risk assessment for chemicals in the environment

Faber, Jack H. ; Marshall, Stuart ; Van den Brink, Paul J. ; Maltby, Lorraine

The Science of the total environment, 2019-02, Vol.651 (Pt 1), p.1067-1077 [同儕審閱期刊]

可取得全文

引用 被引用
  • 題名:
    Priorities and opportunities in the application of the ecosystem services concept in risk assessment for chemicals in the environment
  • 著者: Faber, Jack H. ; Marshall, Stuart ; Van den Brink, Paul J. ; Maltby, Lorraine
  • 主題: Alterra - Animal ecology ; Alterra - Dierecologie ; Alterra - Environmental risk assessment ; Animal Ecology ; Aquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management ; Aquatische Ecologie en Waterkwaliteitsbeheer ; Dierecologie ; Environmental Risk Assessment ; Landscape-scale risk assessment ; Leerstoelgroep Aquatische ecologie en waterkwaliteitsbeheer ; Prospective risk assessment ; Research needs ; Retrospective risk assessment ; WIMEK
  • 所屬期刊: The Science of the total environment, 2019-02, Vol.651 (Pt 1), p.1067-1077
  • 描述: The ecosystem services approach has gained broad interest in regulatory and policy circles for use in ecological risk assessment. Whilst identifying several challenges, scientific experts from European regulatory authorities, the chemical industry and academia considered the approach applicable to all chemical sectors and potentially contributing to greater ecological relevance for setting and assessing environmental protection goals compared to current European regulatory frameworks for chemicals. These challenges were addressed in workshops to develop a common understanding across stakeholders on how the ecosystem services concept might be used in chemical risk assessment and what would need to be done to implement it. This paper describes the consensus outcome of those discussions. Knowledge gaps and research needs were identified and prioritised, exploring the use of novel approaches from ecology, ecotoxicology and ecological modelling. Where applicable, distinction is made between prospective and retrospective ecological risk assessment. For prospective risk assessment the development of environmental scenarios accounting for chemical exposure and ecological conditions was designated as a top priority. For retrospective risk assessment the top priority research need was development of reference conditions for key ecosystem services and guidance for their derivation. Both prospective and retrospective risk assessment would benefit from guidance on the taxa and measurement endpoints relevant to specific ecosystem services and from improved understanding of the relationships between measurement endpoints from standard toxicity tests and the ecosystem services of interest (i.e. assessment endpoints). The development of mechanistic models, which could serve as ecological production functions, was identified as a priority. A conceptual framework for future chemical risk assessment based on an ecosystem services approach is presented. [Display omitted] •The ecosystem services (ES) approach has potential to enhance ecological and societal relevance in ERA.•Stakeholders in EU regulation, industry, academia and NGOs agreed on priority research needs.•A framework for future chemical risk assessment based on an ES approach is presented.•Further development may benefit from recent progress in other disciplines.
  • 出版者: Netherlands: Elsevier B.V
  • 語言: 英文
  • 識別號: ISSN: 0048-9697
    EISSN: 1879-1026
    DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.209
    PMID: 30266052
  • 資源來源: Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
連結
返回到檢索清單
    臺南大學版權所有 © 2016 NUTN All Rights Reserved

正在檢索遠程資料庫，請稍等

  • 查詢:
  • 在scope:("NUTN"),scope:(NUTN_ALEPH),scope:(NUTN_IR),scope:(NUTN_SFX),primo_central_multiple_fe
  • 顯示現有記錄